jpskill.com
📦 その他 コミュニティ

ticket-triage

Triage and prioritize a support ticket or customer issue. Use when a new ticket comes in and needs categorization, assigning P1-P4 priority, deciding which team should handle it, or checking whether it's a duplicate or known issue before routing.

⚡ おすすめ: コマンド1行でインストール(60秒)

下記のコマンドをコピーしてターミナル(Mac/Linux)または PowerShell(Windows)に貼り付けてください。 ダウンロード → 解凍 → 配置まで全自動。

🍎 Mac / 🐧 Linux
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cd ~/.claude/skills && curl -L -o ticket-triage.zip https://jpskill.com/download/22581.zip && unzip -o ticket-triage.zip && rm ticket-triage.zip
🪟 Windows (PowerShell)
$d = "$env:USERPROFILE\.claude\skills"; ni -Force -ItemType Directory $d | Out-Null; iwr https://jpskill.com/download/22581.zip -OutFile "$d\ticket-triage.zip"; Expand-Archive "$d\ticket-triage.zip" -DestinationPath $d -Force; ri "$d\ticket-triage.zip"

完了後、Claude Code を再起動 → 普通に「動画プロンプト作って」のように話しかけるだけで自動発動します。

💾 手動でダウンロードしたい(コマンドが難しい人向け)
  1. 1. 下の青いボタンを押して ticket-triage.zip をダウンロード
  2. 2. ZIPファイルをダブルクリックで解凍 → ticket-triage フォルダができる
  3. 3. そのフォルダを C:\Users\あなたの名前\.claude\skills\(Win)または ~/.claude/skills/(Mac)へ移動
  4. 4. Claude Code を再起動

⚠️ ダウンロード・利用は自己責任でお願いします。当サイトは内容・動作・安全性について責任を負いません。

🎯 このSkillでできること

下記の説明文を読むと、このSkillがあなたに何をしてくれるかが分かります。Claudeにこの分野の依頼をすると、自動で発動します。

📦 インストール方法 (3ステップ)

  1. 1. 上の「ダウンロード」ボタンを押して .skill ファイルを取得
  2. 2. ファイル名の拡張子を .skill から .zip に変えて展開(macは自動展開可)
  3. 3. 展開してできたフォルダを、ホームフォルダの .claude/skills/ に置く
    • · macOS / Linux: ~/.claude/skills/
    • · Windows: %USERPROFILE%\.claude\skills\

Claude Code を再起動すれば完了。「このSkillを使って…」と話しかけなくても、関連する依頼で自動的に呼び出されます。

詳しい使い方ガイドを見る →
最終更新
2026-05-18
取得日時
2026-05-18
同梱ファイル
1

📖 Skill本文(日本語訳)

※ 原文(英語/中国語)を Gemini で日本語化したものです。Claude 自身は原文を読みます。誤訳がある場合は原文をご確認ください。

/ticket-triage

見慣れないプレースホルダーがある場合や、どのツールが接続されているかを確認する必要がある場合は、CONNECTORS.md を参照してください。

受信したサポートチケットまたは顧客の問題を分類し、優先順位を付け、ルーティングします。提案された初期応答を含む、構造化されたトリアージ評価を生成します。

使用方法

/ticket-triage <ticket text, customer message, or issue description>

例:

  • /ticket-triage Customer says their dashboard has been showing a blank page since this morning
  • /ticket-triage "I was charged twice for my subscription this month"
  • /ticket-triage User can't connect their SSO — getting a 403 error on the callback URL
  • /ticket-triage Feature request: they want to export reports as PDF

ワークフロー

1. 問題の解析

入力を読み込み、以下を抽出します。

  • 核心的な問題: 顧客が実際に経験していることは何ですか?
  • 症状: どのような具体的な動作やエラーが見られますか?
  • 顧客の状況: 誰ですか?利用可能なアカウントの詳細、プランレベル、または履歴はありますか?
  • 緊急性の兆候: 顧客はブロックされていますか?これは本番環境ですか?影響を受けているユーザー数は何人ですか?
  • 感情状態: 不満、混乱、事実に基づいた、エスカレートしている?

2. 分類と優先順位付け

以下のカテゴリ分類と優先順位フレームワークを使用して、以下を行います。

  • 主要カテゴリ(バグ、ハウツー、機能リクエスト、請求、アカウント、統合、セキュリティ、データ、パフォーマンス)とオプションの副次カテゴリを割り当てます。
  • 影響と緊急性に基づいて優先順位(P1~P4)を割り当てます。
  • 問題が対応する製品領域を特定します。

3. 重複と既知の問題の確認

ルーティングする前に、利用可能な情報源を確認します。

  • ~~サポートプラットフォーム: 類似のオープンチケットまたは最近解決されたチケットを検索します。
  • ~~ナレッジベース: 既知の問題または既存のドキュメントを確認します。
  • ~~プロジェクトトラッカー: 既存のバグ報告または機能リクエストがあるか確認します。

以下の重複検出プロセスを適用します。

4. ルーティングの決定

以下のルーティングルールを使用して、カテゴリと複雑さに基づいて、どのチームまたはキューがこれを処理すべきかを推奨します。

5. トリアージ出力の生成

## Triage: [One-line issue summary]

**Category:** [Primary] / [Secondary if applicable]
**Priority:** [P1-P4] — [Brief justification]
**Product area:** [Area/team]

### Issue Summary
[2-3 sentence summary of what the customer is experiencing]

### Key Details
- **Customer:** [Name/account if known]
- **Impact:** [Who and what is affected]
- **Workaround:** [Available / Not available / Unknown]
- **Related tickets:** [Links to similar issues if found]
- **Known issue:** [Yes — link / No / Checking]

### Routing Recommendation
**Route to:** [Team or queue]
**Why:** [Brief reasoning]

### Suggested Initial Response
[Draft first response to the customer — acknowledge the issue,
set expectations, provide workaround if available.
Use the auto-response templates below as a starting point.]

### Internal Notes
- [Any additional context for the agent picking this up]
- [Reproduction hints if it's a bug]
- [Escalation triggers to watch for]

6. 次のステップの提案

トリアージを提示した後:

  • 「顧客への完全な返信を作成しましょうか?」
  • 「この問題について、さらに詳しい情報を検索しましょうか?」
  • 「これがトラッカーの既知のバグであるか確認しましょうか?」
  • 「これをエスカレートしましょうか? /customer-escalation と組み合わせて処理できます。」

カテゴリ分類

すべてのチケットに主要カテゴリを割り当て、オプションで副次カテゴリを割り当てます。

カテゴリ 説明 シグナルワード
Bug 製品が誤動作している、または予期せぬ動作をしている Error, broken, crash, not working, unexpected, wrong, failing
How-to 顧客が製品の使用方法についてガイダンスを必要としている How do I, can I, where is, setting up, configure, help with
Feature request 顧客が存在しない機能を求めている Would be great if, wish I could, any plans to, requesting
Billing 支払い、サブスクリプション、請求書、または料金に関する問題 Charge, invoice, payment, subscription, refund, upgrade, downgrade
Account アカウントアクセス、権限、設定、またはユーザー管理 Login, password, access, permission, SSO, locked out, can't sign in
Integration サードパーティツールまたはAPIへの接続に関する問題 API, webhook, integration, connect, OAuth, sync, third-party
Security セキュリティ上の懸念、データアクセス、またはコンプライアンスに関する質問 Data breach, unauthorized, compliance, GDPR, SOC 2, vulnerability
Data データ品質、移行、インポート/エクスポートに関する問題 Missing data, export, import, migration, incorrect data, duplicates
Performance 速度、信頼性、または可用性に関する問題 Slow, timeout, latency, down, unavailable, degraded

カテゴリ決定のヒント

  • 顧客がバグと機能リクエストの両方を報告した場合、バグが主要カテゴリです。
  • バグが原因でログインできない場合、カテゴリはBug(Accountではない)です。根本原因がカテゴリを決定します。
  • 「以前は動作していたのに、今は動作しない」= Bug
  • 「異なる動作をしてほしい」= Feature request
  • 「どうすれば動作させられますか?」= How-to
  • 迷った場合は、Bugに傾倒してください。調査する方が、却下するよりも良いです。

優先順位フレームワーク

P1 — 重大

基準: 本番システムダウン、データ損失または破損、セキュリティ侵害、すべてのユーザーまたはほとんどのユーザーが影響を受けている。

  • 顧客が製品をまったく使用できない
  • データが失われている、破損している、または漏洩している
  • セキュリティインシデントが進行中である
  • 問題が悪化している、または範囲が拡大している

SLAの期待: 1時間以内に対応。解決または軽減されるまで継続的に作業。1〜2時間ごとに更新。

P2 — 高

基準: 主要な機能が破損している、重要なワークフローがブロックされている、多くのユーザーが影響を受けている、回避策がない。

  • コアワークフローが破損しているが、製品は部分的に使用可能である
  • 複数のユーザーが影響を受けている、または主要なアカウントが影響を受けている
  • 問題が時間のかかる作業をブロックしている
  • 合理的な回避策が存在しない

SLAの期待: 4時間以内に対応。同日中に積極的な調査。更新

(原文はここで切り詰められています)

📜 原文 SKILL.md(Claudeが読む英語/中国語)を展開

/ticket-triage

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Categorize, prioritize, and route an incoming support ticket or customer issue. Produces a structured triage assessment with a suggested initial response.

Usage

/ticket-triage <ticket text, customer message, or issue description>

Examples:

  • /ticket-triage Customer says their dashboard has been showing a blank page since this morning
  • /ticket-triage "I was charged twice for my subscription this month"
  • /ticket-triage User can't connect their SSO — getting a 403 error on the callback URL
  • /ticket-triage Feature request: they want to export reports as PDF

Workflow

1. Parse the Issue

Read the input and extract:

  • Core problem: What is the customer actually experiencing?
  • Symptoms: What specific behavior or error are they seeing?
  • Customer context: Who is this? Any account details, plan level, or history available?
  • Urgency signals: Are they blocked? Is this production? How many users affected?
  • Emotional state: Frustrated, confused, matter-of-fact, escalating?

2. Categorize and Prioritize

Using the category taxonomy and priority framework below:

  • Assign a primary category (bug, how-to, feature request, billing, account, integration, security, data, performance) and an optional secondary category
  • Assign a priority (P1–P4) based on impact and urgency
  • Identify the product area the issue maps to

3. Check for Duplicates and Known Issues

Before routing, check available sources:

  • ~~support platform: Search for similar open or recently resolved tickets
  • ~~knowledge base: Check for known issues or existing documentation
  • ~~project tracker: Check if there's an existing bug report or feature request

Apply the duplicate detection process below.

4. Determine Routing

Using the routing rules below, recommend which team or queue should handle this based on category and complexity.

5. Generate Triage Output

## Triage: [One-line issue summary]

**Category:** [Primary] / [Secondary if applicable]
**Priority:** [P1-P4] — [Brief justification]
**Product area:** [Area/team]

### Issue Summary
[2-3 sentence summary of what the customer is experiencing]

### Key Details
- **Customer:** [Name/account if known]
- **Impact:** [Who and what is affected]
- **Workaround:** [Available / Not available / Unknown]
- **Related tickets:** [Links to similar issues if found]
- **Known issue:** [Yes — link / No / Checking]

### Routing Recommendation
**Route to:** [Team or queue]
**Why:** [Brief reasoning]

### Suggested Initial Response
[Draft first response to the customer — acknowledge the issue,
set expectations, provide workaround if available.
Use the auto-response templates below as a starting point.]

### Internal Notes
- [Any additional context for the agent picking this up]
- [Reproduction hints if it's a bug]
- [Escalation triggers to watch for]

6. Offer Next Steps

After presenting the triage:

  • "Want me to draft a full response to the customer?"
  • "Should I search for more context on this issue?"
  • "Want me to check if this is a known bug in the tracker?"
  • "Should I escalate this? I can package it with /customer-escalation."

Category Taxonomy

Assign every ticket a primary category and optionally a secondary category:

Category Description Signal Words
Bug Product is behaving incorrectly or unexpectedly Error, broken, crash, not working, unexpected, wrong, failing
How-to Customer needs guidance on using the product How do I, can I, where is, setting up, configure, help with
Feature request Customer wants a capability that doesn't exist Would be great if, wish I could, any plans to, requesting
Billing Payment, subscription, invoice, or pricing issues Charge, invoice, payment, subscription, refund, upgrade, downgrade
Account Account access, permissions, settings, or user management Login, password, access, permission, SSO, locked out, can't sign in
Integration Issues connecting to third-party tools or APIs API, webhook, integration, connect, OAuth, sync, third-party
Security Security concerns, data access, or compliance questions Data breach, unauthorized, compliance, GDPR, SOC 2, vulnerability
Data Data quality, migration, import/export issues Missing data, export, import, migration, incorrect data, duplicates
Performance Speed, reliability, or availability issues Slow, timeout, latency, down, unavailable, degraded

Category Determination Tips

  • If the customer reports both a bug and a feature request, the bug is primary
  • If they can't log in due to a bug, category is Bug (not Account) — root cause drives the category
  • "It used to work and now it doesn't" = Bug
  • "I want it to work differently" = Feature request
  • "How do I make it work?" = How-to
  • When in doubt, lean toward Bug — it's better to investigate than dismiss

Priority Framework

P1 — Critical

Criteria: Production system down, data loss or corruption, security breach, all or most users affected.

  • The customer cannot use the product at all
  • Data is being lost, corrupted, or exposed
  • A security incident is in progress
  • The issue is worsening or expanding in scope

SLA expectation: Respond within 1 hour. Continuous work until resolved or mitigated. Updates every 1-2 hours.

P2 — High

Criteria: Major feature broken, significant workflow blocked, many users affected, no workaround.

  • A core workflow is broken but the product is partially usable
  • Multiple users are affected or a key account is impacted
  • The issue is blocking time-sensitive work
  • No reasonable workaround exists

SLA expectation: Respond within 4 hours. Active investigation same day. Updates every 4 hours.

P3 — Medium

Criteria: Feature partially broken, workaround available, single user or small team affected.

  • A feature isn't working correctly but a workaround exists
  • The issue is inconvenient but not blocking critical work
  • A single user or small team is affected
  • The customer is not escalating urgently

SLA expectation: Respond within 1 business day. Resolution or update within 3 business days.

P4 — Low

Criteria: Minor inconvenience, cosmetic issue, general question, feature request.

  • Cosmetic or UI issues that don't affect functionality
  • Feature requests and enhancement ideas
  • General questions or how-to inquiries
  • Issues with simple, documented solutions

SLA expectation: Respond within 2 business days. Resolution at normal pace.

Priority Escalation Triggers

Automatically bump priority up when:

  • Customer has been waiting longer than the SLA allows
  • Multiple customers report the same issue (pattern detected)
  • The customer explicitly escalates or mentions executive involvement
  • A workaround that was in place stops working
  • The issue expands in scope (more users, more data, new symptoms)

Routing Rules

Route tickets based on category and complexity:

Route to When
Tier 1 (frontline support) How-to questions, known issues with documented solutions, billing inquiries, password resets
Tier 2 (senior support) Bugs requiring investigation, complex configuration, integration troubleshooting, account issues
Engineering Confirmed bugs needing code fixes, infrastructure issues, performance degradation
Product Feature requests with significant demand, design decisions, workflow gaps
Security Data access concerns, vulnerability reports, compliance questions
Billing/Finance Refund requests, contract disputes, complex billing adjustments

Duplicate Detection

Before creating a new ticket or routing, check for duplicates:

  1. Search by symptom: Look for tickets with similar error messages or descriptions
  2. Search by customer: Check if this customer has an open ticket for the same issue
  3. Search by product area: Look for recent tickets in the same feature area
  4. Check known issues: Compare against documented known issues

If a duplicate is found:

  • Link the new ticket to the existing one
  • Notify the customer that this is a known issue being tracked
  • Add any new information from the new report to the existing ticket
  • Bump priority if the new report adds urgency (more customers affected, etc.)

Auto-Response Templates by Category

Bug — Initial Response

Thank you for reporting this. I can see how [specific impact]
would be disruptive for your work.

I've logged this as a [priority] issue and our team is
investigating. [If workaround exists: "In the meantime, you
can [workaround]."]

I'll update you within [SLA timeframe] with what we find.

How-to — Initial Response

Great question! [Direct answer or link to documentation]

[If more complex: "Let me walk you through the steps:"]
[Steps or guidance]

Let me know if that helps, or if you have any follow-up
questions.

Feature Request — Initial Response

Thank you for this suggestion — I can see why [capability]
would be valuable for your workflow.

I've documented this and shared it with our product team.
While I can't commit to a specific timeline, your feedback
directly informs our roadmap priorities.

[If alternative exists: "In the meantime, you might find
[alternative] helpful for achieving something similar."]

Billing — Initial Response

I understand billing issues need prompt attention. Let me
look into this for you.

[If straightforward: resolution details]
[If complex: "I'm reviewing your account now and will have
an answer for you within [timeframe]."]

Security — Initial Response

Thank you for flagging this — we take security concerns
seriously and are reviewing this immediately.

I've escalated this to our security team for investigation.
We'll follow up with you within [timeframe] with our findings.

[If action is needed: "In the meantime, we recommend
[protective action]."]

Triage Best Practices

  1. Read the full ticket before categorizing — context in later messages often changes the assessment
  2. Categorize by root cause, not just the symptom described
  3. When in doubt on priority, err on the side of higher — it's easier to de-escalate than to recover from a missed SLA
  4. Always check for duplicates and known issues before routing
  5. Write internal notes that help the next person pick up context quickly
  6. Include what you've already checked or ruled out to avoid duplicate investigation
  7. Flag patterns — if you're seeing the same issue repeatedly, escalate the pattern even if individual tickets are low priority