🛠️ Codebase監査PrePush
GitHubにコードを公開する前に、不要なファイルや
📺 まず動画で見る(YouTube)
▶ 【衝撃】最強のAIエージェント「Claude Code」の最新機能・使い方・プログラミングをAIで効率化する超実践術を解説! ↗
※ jpskill.com 編集部が参考用に選んだ動画です。動画の内容と Skill の挙動は厳密には一致しないことがあります。
📜 元の英語説明(参考)
Deep audit before GitHub push: removes junk files, dead code, security holes, and optimization issues. Checks every file line-by-line for production readiness.
🇯🇵 日本人クリエイター向け解説
GitHubにコードを公開する前に、不要なファイルや
※ jpskill.com 編集部が日本のビジネス現場向けに補足した解説です。Skill本体の挙動とは独立した参考情報です。
⚠️ ダウンロード・利用は自己責任でお願いします。当サイトは内容・動作・安全性について責任を負いません。
🎯 このSkillでできること
下記の説明文を読むと、このSkillがあなたに何をしてくれるかが分かります。Claudeにこの分野の依頼をすると、自動で発動します。
📦 インストール方法 (3ステップ)
- 1. 上の「ダウンロード」ボタンを押して .skill ファイルを取得
- 2. ファイル名の拡張子を .skill から .zip に変えて展開(macは自動展開可)
- 3. 展開してできたフォルダを、ホームフォルダの
.claude/skills/に置く- · macOS / Linux:
~/.claude/skills/ - · Windows:
%USERPROFILE%\.claude\skills\
- · macOS / Linux:
Claude Code を再起動すれば完了。「このSkillを使って…」と話しかけなくても、関連する依頼で自動的に呼び出されます。
詳しい使い方ガイドを見る →- 最終更新
- 2026-05-17
- 取得日時
- 2026-05-17
- 同梱ファイル
- 1
💬 こう話しかけるだけ — サンプルプロンプト
- › Codebase Audit Pre Push を使って、最小構成のサンプルコードを示して
- › Codebase Audit Pre Push の主な使い方と注意点を教えて
- › Codebase Audit Pre Push を既存プロジェクトに組み込む方法を教えて
これをClaude Code に貼るだけで、このSkillが自動発動します。
📖 Claude が読む原文 SKILL.md(中身を展開)
この本文は AI(Claude)が読むための原文(英語または中国語)です。日本語訳は順次追加中。
Pre-Push Codebase Audit
As a senior engineer, you're doing the final review before pushing this code to GitHub. Check everything carefully and fix problems as you find them.
When to Use This Skill
- User requests "audit the codebase" or "review before push"
- Before making the first push to GitHub
- Before making a repository public
- Pre-production deployment review
- User asks to "clean up the code" or "optimize everything"
Your Job
Review the entire codebase file by file. Read the code carefully. Fix issues right away. Don't just note problems—make the necessary changes.
Audit Process
1. Clean Up Junk Files
Start by looking for files that shouldn't be on GitHub:
Delete these immediately:
- OS files:
.DS_Store,Thumbs.db,desktop.ini - Logs:
*.log,npm-debug.log*,yarn-error.log* - Temp files:
*.tmp,*.temp,*.cache,*.swp - Build output:
dist/,build/,.next/,out/,.cache/ - Dependencies:
node_modules/,vendor/,__pycache__/,*.pyc - IDE files:
.idea/,.vscode/(ask user first),*.iml,.project - Backup files:
*.bak,*_old.*,*_backup.*,*_copy.* - Test artifacts:
coverage/,.nyc_output/,test-results/ - Personal junk:
TODO.txt,NOTES.txt,scratch.*,test123.*
Critical - Check for secrets:
.envfiles (should never be committed)- Files containing:
password,api_key,token,secret,private_key *.pem,*.key,*.cert,credentials.json,serviceAccountKey.json
If you find secrets in the code, mark it as a CRITICAL BLOCKER.
2. Fix .gitignore
Check if the .gitignore file exists and is thorough. If it’s missing or not complete, update it to include all junk file patterns above. Ensure that .env.example exists with keys but no values.
3. Audit Every Source File
Look through each code file and check:
Dead Code (remove immediately):
- Commented-out code blocks
- Unused imports/requires
- Unused variables (declared but never used)
- Unused functions (defined but never called)
- Unreachable code (after
return, insideif (false)) - Duplicate logic (same code in multiple places—combine)
Code Quality (fix issues as you go):
- Vague names:
data,info,temp,thing→ rename to be descriptive - Magic numbers:
if (status === 3)→ extract to named constant - Debug statements: remove
console.log,print(),debugger - TODO/FIXME comments: either resolve them or delete them
- TypeScript
any: add proper types or explain whyanyis used - Use
===instead of==in JavaScript - Functions longer than 50 lines: consider splitting
- Nested code greater than 3 levels: refactor with early returns
Logic Issues (critical):
- Missing null/undefined checks
- Array operations on potentially empty arrays
- Async functions that are not awaited
- Promises without
.catch()or try/catch - Possibilities for infinite loops
- Missing
defaultin switch statements
4. Security Check (Zero Tolerance)
Secrets: Search for hardcoded passwords, API keys, and tokens. They must be in environment variables.
Injection vulnerabilities:
- SQL: No string concatenation in queries—use parameterized queries only
- Command injection: No
exec()with user-provided input - Path traversal: No file paths from user input without validation
- XSS: No
innerHTMLordangerouslySetInnerHTMLwith user data
Auth/Authorization:
- Passwords hashed with bcrypt/argon2 (never MD5 or plain text)
- Protected routes check for authentication
- Authorization checks on the server side, not just in the UI
- No IDOR: verify users own the resources they are accessing
Data exposure:
- API responses do not leak unnecessary information
- Error messages do not expose stack traces or database details
- Pagination is present on list endpoints
Dependencies:
- Run
npm auditor an equivalent tool - Flag critically outdated or vulnerable packages
5. Scalability Check
Database:
- N+1 queries: loops with database calls inside → use JOINs or batch queries
- Missing indexes on WHERE/ORDER BY columns
- Unbounded queries: add LIMIT or pagination
- Avoid
SELECT *: specify columns
API Design:
- Heavy operations (like email, reports, file processing) → move to a background queue
- Rate limiting on public endpoints
- Caching for data that is read frequently
- Timeouts on external calls
Code:
- No global mutable state
- Clean up event listeners (to avoid memory leaks)
- Stream large files instead of loading them into memory
6. Architecture Check
Organization:
- Clear folder structure
- Files are in logical locations
- No "misc" or "stuff" folders
Separation of concerns:
- UI layer: only responsible for rendering
- Business logic: pure functions
- Data layer: isolated database queries
- No 500+ line "god files"
Reusability:
- Duplicate code → extract to shared utilities
- Constants defined once and imported
- Types/interfaces reused, not redefined
7. Performance
Backend:
- Expensive operations do not block requests
- Batch database calls when possible
- Set cache headers correctly
Frontend (if applicable):
- Implement code splitting
- Optimize images
- Avoid massive dependencies for small utilities
- Use lazy loading for heavy components
8. Documentation
README.md must include:
- Description of what the project does
- Instructions for installation and execution
- Required environment variables
- Guidance on running tests
Code comments:
- Explain WHY, not WHAT
- Provide explanations for complex logic
- Avoid comments that merely repeat the code
9. Testing
- Critical paths should have tests (auth, payments, core features)
- No
test.onlyorfdescribeshould remain in the code - Avoid
test.skipwithout an explanation - Tests should verify behavior, not implementation details
10. Final Verification
After making all changes, run the app. Ensure nothing is broken. Check that:
- The app starts without errors
- Main features work
- Tests pass (if they exist)
- No regressions have been introduced
Output Format
After auditing, provide a report:
CODEBASE AUDIT COMPLETE
FILES REMOVED:
- node_modules/ (build artifact)
- .env (contained secrets)
- old_backup.js (unused duplicate)
CODE CHANGES:
[src/api/users.js]
✂ Removed unused import: lodash
✂ Removed dead function: formatOldWay()
🔧 Renamed 'data' → 'userData' for clarity
🛡 Added try/catch around API call (line 47)
[src/db/queries.js]
⚡ Fixed N+1 query: now uses JOIN instead of loop
SECURITY ISSUES:
🚨 CRITICAL: Hardcoded API key in config.js (line 12) → moved to .env
⚠️ HIGH: SQL injection risk in search.js (line 34) → fixed with parameterized query
SCALABILITY:
⚡ Added pagination to /api/users endpoint
⚡ Added index on users.email column
FINAL STATUS:
✅ CLEAN - Ready to push to GitHub
Scores:
Security: 9/10 (one minor header missing)
Code Quality: 10/10
Scalability: 9/10
Overall: 9/10
Key Principles
- Read the code thoroughly, don't skim
- Fix issues immediately, don’t just document them
- If uncertain about removing something, ask the user
- Test after making changes
- Be thorough but practical—focus on real problems
- Security issues are blockers—nothing should ship with critical vulnerabilities
Related Skills
@security-auditor- Deeper security review@systematic-debugging- Investigate specific issues@git-pushing- Push code after audit
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.