Causal Inference
Determine cause-and-effect relationships using propensity scoring, instrumental variables, and causal graphs for policy evaluation and treatment effects
下記のコマンドをコピーしてターミナル(Mac/Linux)または PowerShell(Windows)に貼り付けてください。 ダウンロード → 解凍 → 配置まで全自動。
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cd ~/.claude/skills && curl -L -o causal-inference.zip https://jpskill.com/download/21357.zip && unzip -o causal-inference.zip && rm causal-inference.zip
$d = "$env:USERPROFILE\.claude\skills"; ni -Force -ItemType Directory $d | Out-Null; iwr https://jpskill.com/download/21357.zip -OutFile "$d\causal-inference.zip"; Expand-Archive "$d\causal-inference.zip" -DestinationPath $d -Force; ri "$d\causal-inference.zip"
完了後、Claude Code を再起動 → 普通に「動画プロンプト作って」のように話しかけるだけで自動発動します。
💾 手動でダウンロードしたい(コマンドが難しい人向け)
- 1. 下の青いボタンを押して
causal-inference.zipをダウンロード - 2. ZIPファイルをダブルクリックで解凍 →
causal-inferenceフォルダができる - 3. そのフォルダを
C:\Users\あなたの名前\.claude\skills\(Win)または~/.claude/skills/(Mac)へ移動 - 4. Claude Code を再起動
⚠️ ダウンロード・利用は自己責任でお願いします。当サイトは内容・動作・安全性について責任を負いません。
🎯 このSkillでできること
下記の説明文を読むと、このSkillがあなたに何をしてくれるかが分かります。Claudeにこの分野の依頼をすると、自動で発動します。
📦 インストール方法 (3ステップ)
- 1. 上の「ダウンロード」ボタンを押して .skill ファイルを取得
- 2. ファイル名の拡張子を .skill から .zip に変えて展開(macは自動展開可)
- 3. 展開してできたフォルダを、ホームフォルダの
.claude/skills/に置く- · macOS / Linux:
~/.claude/skills/ - · Windows:
%USERPROFILE%\.claude\skills\
- · macOS / Linux:
Claude Code を再起動すれば完了。「このSkillを使って…」と話しかけなくても、関連する依頼で自動的に呼び出されます。
詳しい使い方ガイドを見る →- 最終更新
- 2026-05-18
- 取得日時
- 2026-05-18
- 同梱ファイル
- 2
📖 Skill本文(日本語訳)
※ 原文(英語/中国語)を Gemini で日本語化したものです。Claude 自身は原文を読みます。誤訳がある場合は原文をご確認ください。
因果推論
概要
因果推論は、相関関係を超えて何が何を引き起こすのかを理解し、原因と結果の関係を特定し、介入効果を推定します。
使用場面
- 政策介入やビジネス上の意思決定の影響を評価する場合
- ランダム化実験が実施できない場合に介入効果を推定する場合
- 観察データにおける交絡変数を制御する場合
- マーケティングキャンペーンや製品変更が結果を引き起こしたかどうかを判断する場合
- 異なるユーザーセグメント間での異質な介入効果を分析する場合
- プロペンシティスコアや操作変数を用いて非実験データから因果関係を主張する場合
主要な概念
- 介入 (Treatment): 介入または曝露
- 結果 (Outcome): 結果または帰結
- 交絡 (Confounding): 介入と結果の両方に影響を与える変数
- 因果グラフ (Causal Graph): 関係の視覚的表現
- 介入効果 (Treatment Effect): 介入の影響
- 選択バイアス (Selection Bias): 非ランダムな介入割り当て
因果推論の手法
- ランダム化比較試験 (Randomized Controlled Trials, RCT): 黄金標準
- プロペンシティスコアマッチング (Propensity Score Matching): 介入群と対照群のバランスを取る
- 差の差分法 (Difference-in-Differences): 前後比較
- 操作変数法 (Instrumental Variables): 内生性に対処する
- 因果フォレスト (Causal Forests): 異質な介入効果
Pythonによる実装
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression, LogisticRegression
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from scipy import stats
# Generate observational data with confounding
np.random.seed(42)
n = 1000
# Confounder: Age (affects both treatment and outcome)
age = np.random.uniform(25, 75, n)
# Treatment: Training program (more likely for younger people)
treatment_prob = 0.3 + 0.3 * (75 - age) / 50 # Inverse relationship with age
treatment = (np.random.uniform(0, 1, n) < treatment_prob).astype(int)
# Outcome: Salary (affected by both treatment and age)
# True causal effect of treatment: +$5000
salary = 40000 + 500 * age + 5000 * treatment + np.random.normal(0, 10000, n)
df = pd.DataFrame({
'age': age,
'treatment': treatment,
'salary': salary,
})
print("Observational Data Summary:")
print(df.describe())
print(f"\nTreatment Rate: {df['treatment'].mean():.1%}")
print(f"Average Salary (Control): ${df[df['treatment']==0]['salary'].mean():.0f}")
print(f"Average Salary (Treatment): ${df[df['treatment']==1]['salary'].mean():.0f}")
# 1. Naive Comparison (BIASED - ignores confounding)
naive_effect = df[df['treatment']==1]['salary'].mean() - df[df['treatment']==0]['salary'].mean()
print(f"\n1. Naive Comparison: ${naive_effect:.0f} (BIASED)")
# 2. Regression Adjustment (Covariate Adjustment)
X = df[['treatment', 'age']]
y = df['salary']
model = LinearRegression()
model.fit(X, y)
regression_effect = model.coef_[0]
print(f"\n2. Regression Adjustment: ${regression_effect:.0f}")
# 3. Propensity Score Matching
# Estimate probability of treatment given covariates
ps_model = LogisticRegression()
ps_model.fit(df[['age']], df['treatment'])
df['propensity_score'] = ps_model.predict_proba(df[['age']])[:, 1]
print(f"\n3. Propensity Score Matching:")
print(f"PS range: [{df['propensity_score'].min():.3f}, {df['propensity_score'].max():.3f}]")
# Matching: find control for each treated unit
matched_pairs = []
treated_units = df[df['treatment'] == 1].index
for treated_idx in treated_units:
treated_ps = df.loc[treated_idx, 'propensity_score']
treated_age = df.loc[treated_idx, 'age']
# Find closest control unit
control_units = df[(df['treatment'] == 0) &
(df['propensity_score'] >= treated_ps - 0.1) &
(df['propensity_score'] <= treated_ps + 0.1)].index
if len(control_units) > 0:
closest_control = min(control_units,
key=lambda x: abs(df.loc[x, 'propensity_score'] - treated_ps))
matched_pairs.append({
'treated_idx': treated_idx,
'control_idx': closest_control,
'treated_salary': df.loc[treated_idx, 'salary'],
'control_salary': df.loc[closest_control, 'salary'],
})
matched_df = pd.DataFrame(matched_pairs)
psm_effect = (matched_df['treated_salary'] - matched_df['control_salary']).mean()
print(f"PSM Effect: ${psm_effect:.0f}")
print(f"Matched pairs: {len(matched_df)}")
# 4. Stratification by Propensity Score
df['ps_stratum'] = pd.qcut(df['propensity_score'], q=5, labels=False, duplicates='drop')
stratified_effects = []
for stratum in df['ps_stratum'].unique():
stratum_data = df[df['ps_stratum'] == stratum]
if (stratum_data['treatment'] == 0).sum() > 0 and (stratum_data['treatment'] == 1).sum() > 0:
treated_mean = stratum_data[stratum_data['treatment'] == 1]['salary'].mean()
control_mean = stratum_data[stratum_data['treatment'] == 0]['salary'].mean()
effect = treated_mean - control_mean
stratified_effects.append(effect)
stratified_effect = np.mean(stratified_effects)
print(f"\n4. Stratification by PS: ${stratified_effect:.0f}")
# 5. Visualization
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 2, figsize=(14, 10))
# Treatment distribution by age
ax = axes[0, 0]
treated = df[df['treatment'] == 1]
control = df[df['treatment'] == 0]
ax.hist(control['age'], bins=20, alpha=0.6, label='Control', color='blue')
ax.hist(treated['age'], bins=20, alpha=0.6, label='Treated', color='red')
ax.set_xlabel('Age')
ax.set_ylabel('Frequency')
ax.set_title('Age Distribution by Treatment')
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis='y')
# Salary vs Age (colored by treatment)
ax = axes[0, 1]
ax.scatter(control['age'], control['salary'], alpha=0.5, label='Control', s=30)
ax.scatter(treated['age'], treated['salary'], alpha=0.5, label='Treated', s=30, color='red')
ax.set_xlabel('Age')
ax.set_ylabel('Salary')
ax.set_title('Salary vs Age by Treatment')
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# Propensity Score Distribution
ax = axes[1, 0]
ax.hist 📜 原文 SKILL.md(Claudeが読む英語/中国語)を展開
Causal Inference
Overview
Causal inference determines cause-and-effect relationships and estimates treatment effects, going beyond correlation to understand what causes what.
When to Use
- Evaluating the impact of policy interventions or business decisions
- Estimating treatment effects when randomized experiments aren't feasible
- Controlling for confounding variables in observational data
- Determining if a marketing campaign or product change caused an outcome
- Analyzing heterogeneous treatment effects across different user segments
- Making causal claims from non-experimental data using propensity scores or instrumental variables
Key Concepts
- Treatment: Intervention or exposure
- Outcome: Result or consequence
- Confounding: Variables affecting both treatment and outcome
- Causal Graph: Visual representation of relationships
- Treatment Effect: Impact of intervention
- Selection Bias: Non-random treatment assignment
Causal Methods
- Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT): Gold standard
- Propensity Score Matching: Balance treatment/control
- Difference-in-Differences: Before/after comparison
- Instrumental Variables: Handle endogeneity
- Causal Forests: Heterogeneous treatment effects
Implementation with Python
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression, LogisticRegression
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from scipy import stats
# Generate observational data with confounding
np.random.seed(42)
n = 1000
# Confounder: Age (affects both treatment and outcome)
age = np.random.uniform(25, 75, n)
# Treatment: Training program (more likely for younger people)
treatment_prob = 0.3 + 0.3 * (75 - age) / 50 # Inverse relationship with age
treatment = (np.random.uniform(0, 1, n) < treatment_prob).astype(int)
# Outcome: Salary (affected by both treatment and age)
# True causal effect of treatment: +$5000
salary = 40000 + 500 * age + 5000 * treatment + np.random.normal(0, 10000, n)
df = pd.DataFrame({
'age': age,
'treatment': treatment,
'salary': salary,
})
print("Observational Data Summary:")
print(df.describe())
print(f"\nTreatment Rate: {df['treatment'].mean():.1%}")
print(f"Average Salary (Control): ${df[df['treatment']==0]['salary'].mean():.0f}")
print(f"Average Salary (Treatment): ${df[df['treatment']==1]['salary'].mean():.0f}")
# 1. Naive Comparison (BIASED - ignores confounding)
naive_effect = df[df['treatment']==1]['salary'].mean() - df[df['treatment']==0]['salary'].mean()
print(f"\n1. Naive Comparison: ${naive_effect:.0f} (BIASED)")
# 2. Regression Adjustment (Covariate Adjustment)
X = df[['treatment', 'age']]
y = df['salary']
model = LinearRegression()
model.fit(X, y)
regression_effect = model.coef_[0]
print(f"\n2. Regression Adjustment: ${regression_effect:.0f}")
# 3. Propensity Score Matching
# Estimate probability of treatment given covariates
ps_model = LogisticRegression()
ps_model.fit(df[['age']], df['treatment'])
df['propensity_score'] = ps_model.predict_proba(df[['age']])[:, 1]
print(f"\n3. Propensity Score Matching:")
print(f"PS range: [{df['propensity_score'].min():.3f}, {df['propensity_score'].max():.3f}]")
# Matching: find control for each treated unit
matched_pairs = []
treated_units = df[df['treatment'] == 1].index
for treated_idx in treated_units:
treated_ps = df.loc[treated_idx, 'propensity_score']
treated_age = df.loc[treated_idx, 'age']
# Find closest control unit
control_units = df[(df['treatment'] == 0) &
(df['propensity_score'] >= treated_ps - 0.1) &
(df['propensity_score'] <= treated_ps + 0.1)].index
if len(control_units) > 0:
closest_control = min(control_units,
key=lambda x: abs(df.loc[x, 'propensity_score'] - treated_ps))
matched_pairs.append({
'treated_idx': treated_idx,
'control_idx': closest_control,
'treated_salary': df.loc[treated_idx, 'salary'],
'control_salary': df.loc[closest_control, 'salary'],
})
matched_df = pd.DataFrame(matched_pairs)
psm_effect = (matched_df['treated_salary'] - matched_df['control_salary']).mean()
print(f"PSM Effect: ${psm_effect:.0f}")
print(f"Matched pairs: {len(matched_df)}")
# 4. Stratification by Propensity Score
df['ps_stratum'] = pd.qcut(df['propensity_score'], q=5, labels=False, duplicates='drop')
stratified_effects = []
for stratum in df['ps_stratum'].unique():
stratum_data = df[df['ps_stratum'] == stratum]
if (stratum_data['treatment'] == 0).sum() > 0 and (stratum_data['treatment'] == 1).sum() > 0:
treated_mean = stratum_data[stratum_data['treatment'] == 1]['salary'].mean()
control_mean = stratum_data[stratum_data['treatment'] == 0]['salary'].mean()
effect = treated_mean - control_mean
stratified_effects.append(effect)
stratified_effect = np.mean(stratified_effects)
print(f"\n4. Stratification by PS: ${stratified_effect:.0f}")
# 5. Visualization
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 2, figsize=(14, 10))
# Treatment distribution by age
ax = axes[0, 0]
treated = df[df['treatment'] == 1]
control = df[df['treatment'] == 0]
ax.hist(control['age'], bins=20, alpha=0.6, label='Control', color='blue')
ax.hist(treated['age'], bins=20, alpha=0.6, label='Treated', color='red')
ax.set_xlabel('Age')
ax.set_ylabel('Frequency')
ax.set_title('Age Distribution by Treatment')
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis='y')
# Salary vs Age (colored by treatment)
ax = axes[0, 1]
ax.scatter(control['age'], control['salary'], alpha=0.5, label='Control', s=30)
ax.scatter(treated['age'], treated['salary'], alpha=0.5, label='Treated', s=30, color='red')
ax.set_xlabel('Age')
ax.set_ylabel('Salary')
ax.set_title('Salary vs Age by Treatment')
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# Propensity Score Distribution
ax = axes[1, 0]
ax.hist(df[df['treatment'] == 0]['propensity_score'], bins=20, alpha=0.6, label='Control', color='blue')
ax.hist(df[df['treatment'] == 1]['propensity_score'], bins=20, alpha=0.6, label='Treated', color='red')
ax.set_xlabel('Propensity Score')
ax.set_ylabel('Frequency')
ax.set_title('Propensity Score Distribution')
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis='y')
# Treatment Effect Comparison
ax = axes[1, 1]
methods = ['Naive', 'Regression', 'PSM', 'Stratified']
effects = [naive_effect, regression_effect, psm_effect, stratified_effect]
true_effect = 5000
ax.bar(methods, effects, color=['red', 'orange', 'yellow', 'lightgreen'], alpha=0.7, edgecolor='black')
ax.axhline(y=true_effect, color='green', linestyle='--', linewidth=2, label=f'True Effect (${true_effect:.0f})')
ax.set_ylabel('Treatment Effect ($)')
ax.set_title('Treatment Effect Estimates by Method')
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis='y')
for i, effect in enumerate(effects):
ax.text(i, effect + 200, f'${effect:.0f}', ha='center', va='bottom')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
# 6. Doubly Robust Estimation
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestRegressor
# Propensity score model
ps_model_dr = LogisticRegression().fit(df[['age']], df['treatment'])
ps_scores = ps_model_dr.predict_proba(df[['age']])[:, 1]
# Outcome model
outcome_model = RandomForestRegressor(n_estimators=50, random_state=42)
outcome_model.fit(df[['treatment', 'age']], df['salary'])
# Doubly robust estimator
treated_mask = df['treatment'] == 1
control_mask = df['treatment'] == 0
# Adjust for propensity score
treated_adjusted = (treated_mask.astype(int) * df['salary']) / (ps_scores + 0.01)
control_adjusted = (control_mask.astype(int) * df['salary']) / (1 - ps_scores + 0.01)
# Outcome predictions
pred_treated = outcome_model.predict(df[['treatment', 'age']].replace({'treatment': 0, 1: 1}))
pred_control = outcome_model.predict(df[['treatment', 'age']].replace({'treatment': 1, 0: 0}))
dr_effect = treated_adjusted.sum() / treated_mask.sum() - control_adjusted.sum() / control_mask.sum()
print(f"\n6. Doubly Robust Estimation: ${dr_effect:.0f}")
# 7. Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
print(f"\n7. Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (by Age Quartile):")
for age_q in pd.qcut(df['age'], q=4, duplicates='drop').unique():
mask = (df['age'] >= age_q.left) & (df['age'] < age_q.right)
stratum_data = df[mask]
if (stratum_data['treatment'] == 0).sum() > 0 and (stratum_data['treatment'] == 1).sum() > 0:
treated_mean = stratum_data[stratum_data['treatment'] == 1]['salary'].mean()
control_mean = stratum_data[stratum_data['treatment'] == 0]['salary'].mean()
effect = treated_mean - control_mean
print(f" Age {age_q.left:.0f}-{age_q.right:.0f}: ${effect:.0f}")
# 8. Sensitivity Analysis
print(f"\n8. Sensitivity Analysis (Hidden Confounder Impact):")
# Vary hidden confounder correlation with outcome
for hidden_effect in [1000, 2000, 5000, 10000]:
adjusted_effect = regression_effect - hidden_effect * 0.1
print(f" If hidden confounder worth ${hidden_effect}: Effect = ${adjusted_effect:.0f}")
# 9. Summary Table
print(f"\n" + "="*60)
print("CAUSAL INFERENCE SUMMARY")
print("="*60)
print(f"True Treatment Effect: ${true_effect:,.0f}")
print(f"\nEstimates:")
print(f" Naive (BIASED): ${naive_effect:,.0f}")
print(f" Regression Adjustment: ${regression_effect:,.0f}")
print(f" Propensity Score Matching: ${psm_effect:,.0f}")
print(f" Stratification: ${stratified_effect:,.0f}")
print(f" Doubly Robust: ${dr_effect:,.0f}")
print("="*60)
# 10. Causal Graph (Text representation)
print(f"\n10. Causal Graph (DAG):")
print(f"""
Age → Treatment ← (Selection Bias)
↓ ↓
└─→ Salary
Interpretation:
- Age is a confounder
- Treatment causally affects Salary
- Age directly affects Salary
- Age affects probability of Treatment
""")
Causal Assumptions
- Unconfoundedness: No unmeasured confounders
- Overlap: Common support on propensity scores
- SUTVA: No interference between units
- Consistency: Single version of treatment
Treatment Effect Types
- ATE: Average Treatment Effect (overall)
- ATT: Average Treatment on Treated
- CATE: Conditional Average Treatment Effect
- HTE: Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
Method Strengths
- RCT: Gold standard, controls all confounders
- Matching: Balances groups, preserves overlap
- Regression: Adjusts for covariates
- Instrumental Variables: Handles endogeneity
- Causal Forests: Learns heterogeneous effects
Deliverables
- Causal graph visualization
- Treatment effect estimates
- Sensitivity analysis
- Heterogeneous treatment effects
- Covariate balance assessment
- Propensity score diagnostics
- Final causal inference report
同梱ファイル
※ ZIPに含まれるファイル一覧。`SKILL.md` 本体に加え、参考資料・サンプル・スクリプトが入っている場合があります。
- 📄 SKILL.md (10,977 bytes)
- 📎 scripts/scaffold-analysis.sh (394 bytes)